Remember that English Language Arts must be viewed as assessing literacy through the six language arts (reading, speaking, listening, writing, viewing, representing). The NWT ELA curriculum contains a variety of on-going assessment opportunities. Reading assessment ideas:
Recreational/Independent Level (Easy)
Instructional Level
Frustration Level
Running Records: Running records are a way of observing, scoring, and analyzing children's reading behaviour. They provide information on:
Guideline:
How Often to Take a Running Record Running records are taken with greatest frequency at the earlier stages of reading. Children not progressing at the expected rate should be assessed even more frequently than the schedule suggested below.
Reading Behaviours Beyond noting errors, teachers can learn a lot through observation of student reading behaviour:
| Self-correction (SC) | Self-correction occurs when a child realizes his or her error and corrects it. When a child makes a self-correction, the previous substitution is not scored as an error. |
| Meaning (M) | Meaning is part of the cueing system in which the child takes his or her cue to make sense of text by thinking about the story background, information from pictures, or the meaning of a sentence. These cues assist in the reading of a word or phrase. |
| Structure (S) | Structure refers to the structure of language and is often referred to as syntax. Implicit knowledge of structure helps the reader know if what if what he or she reads sounds correct. |
| Visual (V) | Visual information is related to the look of the letter in a word and the word itself. A reader uses visual information when he or she studies the beginning sound, word length, familiar word chunks, etc. |
Marking M, S, and V on a Running Record: When a child makes an error in a line of text record the source(s) of information used by the child in the second column from the right on the running record form. Write M, S, and V in to the right of the sentence in that column. Then circle M, S, and/or V, depending on the source(s) of information the child used. If the child self-corrects an error in a line of text, use the far right-hand column to record this information. Write M, S, and V to the right of the sentence in that column. Circle the source(s) of information the child used for the self-correction. (You may choose to administer a running record assessment without recording your observations regarding the child's use of meaning (M), structure (S), and visual (V) cues. Even without recording this information on the form and you can still use the information on error, self-correction, and accuracy rates to place the child at a given reading level.) How to Take a Running Record
| Sample Code for Marking a Running Record | |
| Accurate Reading | ![]() |
| Repetition (R) | |
| Self-Correction (SC) | |
| Omission | |
| Insertion | |
| Told (T) | |
| Appeal (A) | |
| Try That Again (TTA) | |
Tallying Errors and Self-Corrections
Scoring a Running Record: The accuracy of the child's reading is calculated by dividing the number of words the child reads correctly (including self-corrections, which are not counted as errors) by the total number of words in each selection (running words). The accuracy is calculated as follows:
| Number of words correct | Example: | |
| (includes self-corrections)X 100 = _______% | Number of words read correctly: | 18 |
| Number of words in selection | Self-corrections | 2 |
| Total number of correct words: | 20 | |
| Total number of words in selection | 25 | |
| 20 x 100; = 80% accuracy | ||
|
25
|
| Accuracy Rate | Text Level | Support Level |
| 96% - 100% | Easy | Little new learning taking place; text appropriate for independent reading |
| 90% - 95% | Instructional | Text that requires the reader to problem solve (independently) new challenges while reading, while maintaining the meaning of the text |
| Below 90% | Hard | Text requires too much reading work: the child has to focus on word-by-word analysis and loses the meaning of the text. |
When analyzing their records of a child's reading, teachers should ask themselves:
References: Teachers' Guide Levels D and E Nelson. Thomson Learning Running records. access: http://specialed.about.com/runningrecords/ 4 Blocks Literacy Framework: Running Records. Access: www.k111.k12.il.us/lafayette/fourblocks/running_records.html [24/01/05]. Balanced Early Literacy: Assessment: Reading: Running Records: Miscue coding system conventions. Access: www.philaK12.pa.us/teachers/frameworks/bel/content/bel_k1b5.htm [24/01/05] Running Records. Reading a-z. Access: [www.readinga-z.com/guided/runrecord.htm1 [24/01/05] Assessing using Conferences: A conference can be as informal as a discussion between the teacher and one of the children, or sometimes with a small group. In a one-to-one conference, the teacher can concentrate on skills and strategies that are specific to the child. For example, listening to children give an informal retelling of a story or asking them questions can offer insights into their level of comprehension. Teachers can ask the child about the strategies he or she finds helpful and model new strategies. In discussion a reading selection, teachers may also want to conference with a small group. Use questions such as the following to:
Teacher Prompt to Support Early Reading Behaviours: Teacher need to use consistent prompt to aid children at various stages of development in the reading process. Prompts are introduced over time and should be appropriate for the child's stage of reading acquisition. Sample prompts include: One to one matching: Teacher Prompt to Support Early Reading Behaviours: Teacher need to use consistent prompt to aid children at various stages of development in the reading process. Prompts are introduced over time and should be appropriate for the child's stage of reading acquisition. Sample prompts include: One to one matching: Read it with your finger. did you have enough words? Did you have too many words? Using known words to help with the reading of the text: You know __________. Does that look like __________? Does ___________ make sense here? Does ___________ sound right? Can you find a word you already know in the new word Cross-checking of information and use of self-monitoring: You said __________. What would you expect to see at the beginning of __________? Were you right? Where's the tricky (hard) part? Check it. Does it look right? Check it. Does it makes sense if you say it like that? Check it. Can we say it that way? Why did you stop? What did you notice? Look at the picture. Do you think it looks like __________? What would fit here? It could be __________, but look at it. Does it look the way you would expect __________ to look? You were almost right. Look at it again and think about what would fit there. Using all sources of information You said __________. Does that makes sense and sound right? Try that again and think about what would make sense and sound right? Do you know something in that word that can help you? What do you know that might help? Phrased and fluent reading: Put the words together so they sound like you are talking. Make your voice go down when you see the periods and up when you see a question mark. What kind of voice do you use when yoiu see dark print? italics? What does it tell you to do? What kind of voice do you use when you see an exclamation mark? What do you do? Teachers' Guide Levels D and E Nelson Thomson Learning.
Assessing using Portfolios:
Areglado, N. & M. Dill. (1997). Let's Write. New York: Scholastic Professional Books Student portfolios usually contain a cross-section of records and examples of student work gathered over time. The information in the file can be used to analyze the strengths and weaknesses of particular children, to plan instruction, to conduct parent and child conferences, and to assist in making decisions about grouping and placement. The student portfolios might include:
Assessing using Portfolios
| Level 4 | Level 3 | Level 2 | Level 1 |
| Thoroughly explains the decisions/rationale behind the inclusion of each item; explanations make detaild references to skills, concepts, knowledge and values | Explains the decisions/rationale behind the inclusion of each item; explanations reference skills, concepts, knowledge and values | Explains, with some assistance and guidance, the decisions/rationale behind the inclusion of most items; explanations intermittently reference skills, concepts, knowledge and values | May be able to explain, with much prompting and assistance, the decisions/rationale behind the inclusion of a few items; explanations infrequently reference skills, concepts, knowledge and values |
| Self-evaluation, reflection, and goal-setting sheets indicate the learner is a reflective practitioner | Self-evaluation, reflection, and goal-setting sheets indicate good awareness | Self-evaluation, reflection, and goal-setting sheets indicate some learner awareness | Self-evaluation, reflection, and goal-setting sheets indicate limited awareness |
| Included items consistently and appropriate reflect the criteria for each category | Included items fulfill expected criteria for each category | Not all items reflect outline criteria; items may be missing or inappropriate | Items reflect little awareness of the criteria required for each category |
Teachers' Guide Level D and E Nelson. Thomas Learning Cornerstones 4, Assessment Guide Gage. Speaking and Listening Assessment Speaking is a vital component of each student's communication repertoire and is not adequately assessed with a one-time formal speech delivered before the class toward the end of a term or year. Oracy must develop through process and, in a classroom setting; there are many opportunities for students to practise theri speaking skills. They share information in small groups, ask and respond to questions orally, retell stories, debated, provide explanations, prepare questions orally, retell stories, debate, provide explanations, prepare audiotapes and voiceovers for videotapes, discuss content and social issues, and make formal presentations and speeches. Every one of these activities provides and opportunity to determine growth and development in the area of speaking. Just as with speaking, students have numerous opportunities to hone their auditory skills on a daily basis. From following oral instructions, to responding to questions, to providing feedback after presentations, to retelling based on teacher read-alouds, listening is an important is an important skill that must be taught. Speaking Scale: Level 3 is the goal for most students
| Level 4 | Level 3 | Level 2 | Level 1 |
| Adjust volume, tone, and pace to reflect content, purpose, audience needs, etc.; voice is expressive and appropriate | Uses appropriate volume, tone, and pace to reflect content, purpose, audience needs, etc.; experiments with voice | Attempts to adjust volume, tone, and pace but adjustments are occasionally misplaced or inappropriate | Often speaks in monotone; volume and pace may be inappropriate (exaggerated in some way) |
| Address whole audience through eye contact | Addresses whole audience using some eye contact | Focuses on one area of audience; frequently refers to note | Shows limited awareness of audience; reads from notes exclusively |
| Uses appropriate non-verbal gestures (body language such as facial expressions, hand gestures, etc.) to complement the presentation | Uses non-verbal gestures to emphasize important points | Occasionally attempts non-verbal gestures but movements are often distracting and misplaced | Non-verbal gestures are not evident |
| Consistently uses effective, appropriate vocabulary; good enunciation and pronunciation | Chosen vocabulary conveys message clearly; pronunication is correct | Relies on basic vocabulary to convey meaning; mispronounces words on occasion | Words often inappropriate and mispronounced |
Listening Scale:
| Level 4 | Level 3 | Level 2 | Level 1 |
| Listens attentively and with interest; exhibits no distracting behaviours | Listens attentively; is conscious of, and tries to avoid, behaviours that might distract the speaker | Listening wavers at times; is easily distracted; engages in distracting behaviours on occasion | Has difficulty focusing listening skills; is regularly distracted; unaware of distracting behaviour |
| Retains all of what is said | Retains most of what is said | Retain some of what is said | Retains little of what is said |
| Follows oral instructions correctly and independently | Follows most oral instructions correctly and independently | Follows most oral instructions with limited assistance | Needs assistance to follow simple oral instructions |
Viewing and Representing Assessment (Cornerstones 4, Assessment Guide, Gage.) A viewing and representing assessment taps the student's thinking process when responding to various print and broadcast media, such as audiotapes, television, films, videotapes, advertisements, magazines, newspapers, and so on. Content, organization, issues, concepts, impact, bias, and sterotypes are the key components. The viewing scale can be used to measure the thinking behind a student's written, oral, visual, or performance-based response to media. The representing scale can be used to assess the students' design and creation of material for presentation to others, such as project work across the curriculum. Viewing Scale:
| Level 4 | Level 3 | Level 2 | Level 1 | |
| Type and Purpose | Can explain type and purpose of a variety of media | Can explain type and purpose of most media | Can explain type and purpose of preferred media | Lacks awareness of type and purpose of media |
| Content | Understands content; can identify and explain explicit and implicit messages | Understands content; can identify and explain explicit messages | Understands content at a basic literal level | Needs assistance to understand content at a literal level |
| Structure and Techniques | Identifies and can explain ways various media achieve a desired effect | Identifies and can explain ways common types of media achieve a desired effect | Identifies and can explain ways preferred media achieve a desired effect | Is unaware media utilize structure and technique to achieve a desired effect |
| Impact | Demonstrates thorough understanding of impact of concrete and subtle ideas; responds personally; explains other viewpoints | Demonstrates good understanding of impact of familiar concepts; responds personally but is aware that other viewpoints are possible | Demonstrates some understanding of basic concepts; may need assistance to respond from personal viewpoint | Has limited awareness of impact; needs assistance and prompting to respond from personal viewpoint |
| Bias | Identifies and explains overt and covert bias | Identifies and explain overt bias | Identifies personal bias only | Shows limited awareness of bias even in its most blatant, obvious forms |
Representing Scale:
| Level 4 | Level 3 | Level 2 | Level 1 | |
| Content | Content effectively conveys intended message; is appropriate for subject and audience | Content effectively conveys a clear message; is generally appropriate for subject and audience | Content sometimes conveys a vague message; is simple and may be inappropriate for subject and audience | Content indicates difficulty with focusing on one idea; conveys a sketchy confusing message |
| Structure and Techniques | Understands and consistently imposes appropriate structure to complement purpose; experiments with techniques for effect | Regularly imposes appropriate structure to complement purpose; experiments with techniques for effect | Occasionally imposes appropriate structure to complement purpose; techniques are simple and sometimes ineffective | Presentation lacks obvious structure; techniques, if attempted are frequently ineffective |
| Impact | Presentation is well suited to purpose; holds audience's interest; presentation is entertaining and informative | Presentation effectively complements purpose; holds audience's attention | Presentation is monotonous and may be ineffective for purpose; may occasionally struggle to sustain audience's attention | Presentation i sdisjointed and difficult to follow |
| Bias | Consistently avoids all forms of bias in presentation | Attempts to eliminate overt bias in presentation | Strong personal bias evident in most presentation | Personal bias may be present but inconsistent |